If you’ve worked with Azure Active Directory B2C in the past, you’ve likely felt both the power and the pain that came with it. While it offered a robust platform for managing customer identities, B2C was showing its age, especially when it came to scalability, extensibility, and developer friendliness. Enter Microsoft Entra External ID—a fresh take on Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) that builds on what B2C started but fixes a lot of what held it back.

In this post, I’ll unpack the differences between Entra B2C and Entra External ID, discuss what makes External ID the next evolution in CIAM, and walk through what technical changes you’ll need to accommodate if you’re migrating a client app to this new model.

What Was Entra B2C, and Why Did It Need to Evolve?

Azure Active Directory B2C was Microsoft’s first go at CIAM. It let organizations build branded, identity-driven experiences for customers. This meant sign-up, sign-in, MFA, user profile editing, and password resets were all handled using custom user flows or technically complex custom policies.

However, it came with limitations:

• Customization of user experience was hard and rigid.
• Integration with other Microsoft security and compliance tools was limited.
• Debugging user flows and policies was a pain.
• Limited support for modern identity governance.

Entra External ID was born out of these pain points, and it brings a modern, flexible, and integrated approach to managing external users at scale.

Key Feature Differences

Why External ID Is the Next-Gen CIAM

Microsoft isn’t just slapping a new name on B2C. External ID is built with the understanding that modern customer experiences demand more agility, tighter security, and seamless developer integrations.

Here’s what makes External ID a true evolution:

• Unified Identity Platform: External ID is part of the broader Microsoft Entra ecosystem, which means it’s not siloed. Your customers, partners, and internal users can all be governed and secured from one place.
• Flexible Identity Journeys: No more wrangling with XML. You define sign-in, sign-up, and multi-factor scenarios through a modern orchestration engine that’s visual and extensible.
• Consistent Governance: You get features like Conditional Access, Identity Protection, Lifecycle workflows, and entitlement management for customers—just like you do for employees.
• Improved Developer Tools: With SDKs for .NET, JavaScript, Python, and Java, plus RESTful APIs, you can build faster without the steep learning curve B2C had.

Technical Changes for Client Applications

If you’re currently using Entra B2C and planning a move to External ID, you’ll need to rethink some of your implementation details. Here are some areas to watch:

1. Authentication Flow Changes

External ID replaces the B2C concept of user flows with Identity Journeys managed in the Entra admin center. These journeys are declarative and modular. Instead of referencing a policy like B2C_1_signup_signin, you’ll now work with orchestration IDs tied to specific journeys.

Before (B2C):

https://yourtenant.b2clogin.com/yourtenant.onmicrosoft.com/B2C_1_signupsignin/oauth2/v2.0/authorize

After (External ID):

https://yourtenant.externalid.microsoft.com/{journey-id}/oauth2/v2.0/authorize

2. Token and Claim Handling

While B2C allowed some customization of token claims via policy files, External ID journeys offer centralized claim mapping and transformation through a GUI. Expect more consistent claim outputs across journeys, but you may need to refactor how your app reads tokens.

3. API Permissions and Scopes

Scopes in External ID are defined differently, often aligning with Entra permission sets and object types. You’ll use Microsoft Graph more extensively to manage users, relationships, roles, and access packages.

Example:

GET https://graph.microsoft.com/externalIdentities/directoryObjects

4. SDK Upgrades

Microsoft is actively releasing new SDKs to simplify External ID integration. If you relied on msal.js or msal.net, expect updated libraries with support for External ID endpoints and configurations.

Keep an eye out for:

• .externalIdLogin({journeyId, scopes})
• Enhanced token caching mechanisms
• Support for federation scenarios with third-party IdPs

5. Branding and UX Adjustments

Because the new platform supports dynamic branding, language settings, and layout controls via the admin portal, your team might want to offload UI management from code to config. This reduces code churn and improves design consistency.

Native authentication in Microsoft Entra External ID

Final Thoughts

Entra External ID represents more than just a new service name. It’s a ground-up rethinking of how Microsoft does CIAM. If you’ve struggled with the clunkiness of B2C in the past, this might be the upgrade you’ve been waiting for.

As a Chief Architect, I see this as a great opportunity to streamline our customer identity strategy, reduce maintenance overhead, and leverage more of the Microsoft Entra ecosystem without jumping through hoops.

But don’t treat this as a drop-in replacement. Migrating requires planning. You’ll need to revisit your auth flows, claims processing, SDK usage, and UI branding. If you invest the time to do it right, your apps will be more secure, scalable, and future-ready.

Further Reading

• Announcing General Availability of Microsoft Entra External ID
• Microsoft Entra External ID documentation
• Migrating users to Microsoft Entra External ID
• Microsoft Graph API reference

If you found this post informative, please considering subscribing to get new posts delivered to your inbox.